Lance and Liz
Lance and Liz

LEQEMBI®
clinical results

Lance is a real LEQEMBI patient and Liz is his care partner.
People shown were compensated for their time, and information is accurate as of August 2025.

With LEQEMBI, early and continuous treatment can slow progression1,2

Study description

Clarity AD Core placebo-controlled period1,3⁣:

An 18-month, global, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial of 1795 patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to Alzheimer's disease (AD) or mild AD dementia with confirmed amyloid beta (Aβ) pathology. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive infusions of LEQEMBI 10 mg/kg (n=898) or placebo (n=897) once every 2 weeks. The primary objective was to evaluate the effect of LEQEMBI as measured by CDR-SB.

Clarity AD long-term extension (LTE)4-6⁣:

A global, open-label, single-arm study evaluating LEQEMBI in patients with early AD for up to 48 months. Patients enrolled in the Clarity AD Core period (0-18 months) were given the option to participate in Clarity AD LTE (18-48 months); some remained on infusion while others were on different subcutaneous maintenance doses. The primary objective was to evaluate the long-term safety and whether the effect of LEQEMBI, as measured by CDR-SB at the end of the Clarity AD Core period, is maintained over time.

Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI):

ADNI is a global (US and Canada) research study that follows the natural progression of AD, including imaging, biomarkers, genetics, and neurocognitive tests, and that actively evaluates the investigation and development of treatments for AD. ADNI is an untreated observational cohort (n=436 at baseline, followed for 48 months) that was a prespecified matched ADNI cohort used to design the Clarity AD study, based on demographics and clinical characteristics.4,5

LEQEMBI met the primary endpoint1

In the Core placebo-controlled period (0-18 months), LEQEMBI achieved statistical significance, slowing progression by 27% vs placebo (P<0.0001).

Ongoing treatment showed continued benefit out to 4 years5,7-9

Data at 4 years show continued separation in CDR-SB scores vs Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). About 94% of patients in the LEQEMBI arm who completed the Core period opted to continue in the LTE after 18 months.

CDR-SB: Change from baseline in cognition and function1,5

Chart showing the cognition and functional decline of LEQEMBI® patients compared to the untreated cohort.

Cutoff: March 31, 2025.10

The LTE study is ongoing.11

LTE data limitations: Patients were enrolled in the LTE after completion of the controlled period and are subject to continued dropout. These data included patients on a range of subcutaneous doses, all within the FDA bioequivalence acceptance criteria (PK/PD)."4,6

ADNI data limitations: This retrospective analysis for ADNI should be interpreted carefully to determine a difference with LEQEMBI because of the potential selection bias and attrition.⁣

AD, Alzheimer’s disease; ADNI, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative; CDR, Clinical Dementia Rating; CDR-SB, Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes; LTE, long-term extension; PD, pharmacodynamics; PK, pharmacokinetics; SE, standard error.

In a prespecified analysis of delayed risk of progression, 4 of 5 patients treated with LEQEMBI remained in the early AD stages through 4 years5,12

Patient progression over time5

In a prespecified analysis, graph visualizing patient dementia stage progression over 48 months. In a prespecified analysis, graph visualizing patient dementia stage progression over 48 months.

81%

of patients remained in the MCI due to AD or mild AD stages through 4 years of treatment5,12

Silhouette of person surrounded by icons representing hobbies

Moderate to severe AD dementia stages are associated with loss of independence and difficulty with daily activities13

Limitations: Patients were enrolled in the LTE after completion of the controlled period and are subject to continued dropout. After 18 months, data included patients on a range of subcutaneous doses, all within the FDA bioequivalence acceptance criteria (PK/PD).4,6

ADNI data limitations: This retrospective analysis for ADNI should be interpreted carefully to determine a difference with LEQEMBI because of the potential selection bias and attrition.

Early AD and low tau data

In a post hoc analysis, LEQEMBI was evaluated in patients with early AD and low tau5,14

At 4 years, 69% of patients with early AD and low tau levels showed no worsening in CDR-SB scores compared with baseline*5

A post-hoc analysis showing the percentage of LEQEMBI® patients with early AD and low tau with no worsening symptoms at 4 years. A post-hoc analysis showing the percentage of LEQEMBI® patients with early AD and low tau with no worsening symptoms at 4 years.

LEQEMBI patients with early AD and low tau showed improvement in CDR-SB scores vs baseline*5

At 18 months:

60%

improved

(placebo 28%)

At 4 years:

56%

improved

  • An increase in CDR-SB score=worsening and a decrease in score=improvement14

*No placebo post 18 months during the LTE.5

Limitations: These are post hoc exploratory analyses data from the tau PET subgroup of the Clarity AD study. These analyses were limited by small sample size and no conclusions can be drawn. After 18 months, data included patients on a range of subcutaneous doses, all within
the FDA bioequivalence acceptance criteria (PK/PD).6,14

Clarity AD: Post hoc analyses of CDR-SB scores in a low tau patient population14

Study description: The predefined optional tau PET substudy looked at outcomes of CDR-SB results across tau levels stratified by the participants’ level of the brain tau aggregates (tau PET), using the Cerveau database, as well as correlations of tau data to clinical outcomes (n=342).

Results of post hoc analysis:

  • Overall tau PET substudy (placebo, 167; LEQEMBI, 175): Adjusted mean difference vs placebo: -0.52 (95% CI: -1.01, -0.04)14,15

  • Low tau PET (<1.06): (placebo, 71; LEQEMBI, 70): Adjusted mean difference vs placebo: -0.59 (95% CI: -1.09, -0.09)14,15

  • Intermediate tau levels (n=191; SUVR ≥1.06-≤2.91) and high tau levels (n=10: SUVR >2.91): (placebo, 96; LEQEMBI, 105): Adjusted mean difference vs placebo: -0.49 (95% CI: -1.19, 0.21)14,15

  • As shown, further analyses were conducted in the low tau group to measure the change from baseline on the CDR-SB14

Magnifying glass exclamation icon

Diagnose with urgency and treat early:

Lower levels of tau accumulation, as identified by SUVR, were found to be indicative of a patient with earlier stages of disease.13,14

No testing for tau is required to start LEQEMBI.1

CI, confidence interval; PET, positron emission tomography; SUVR, standardized uptake value ratio.

Diagnosis to Treatment Brochure

An overview of the steps involved from diagnosis through treatment with LEQEMBI (for eligible patients)

Biomarker endpoint: Plaque negativity

More than half of LEQEMBI patients achieved plaque negativity at 12 months1,3

Key secondary endpoint: Change in Aβ PET Centiloid1

  • -59.1 Centiloid (CL) difference vs placebo at 18 months (P<0.00001)3

Prespecified biomarker endpoint percentage of patients achieving plaque negativity: Measured by conversion to PET amyloid negative (<30 CL)3

3 MONTHS

24%
OF PATIENTS

Placebo: 15%

LEQEMBI n=296

Placebo n=303

6 MONTHS

36%
OF PATIENTS

Placebo: 14%

LEQEMBI n=275

Placebo n=286

12 MONTHS

54%
OF PATIENTS

Placebo: 15%

LEQEMBI n=276

Placebo n=259

18 MONTHS

68%
OF PATIENTS

Placebo: 16%

LEQEMBI n=210*

Placebo n=205*

Limitations: Prespecified biomarker endpoint was not adjusted for multiplicity, therefore, no conclusions or comparisons can be drawn.

*73 subjects were not included at 18 months (per the statistical analysis plan) since their PET assessments were performed after receiving LEQEMBI in the extension phase.3

Abstract ab peptide icon

LEQEMBI can help you treat beyond plaque:

Continuous administration of LEQEMBI works in 2 ways to remove insoluble and soluble Aβ1,3

Frequently asked questions

In Clarity AD, in which stage of AD were most of the patients?

The majority of patients were in the earliest symptomatic stage—MCI due to AD.1,2

Were the LTE data inclusive of both IV and subcutaneously treated patients?

Yes, patients receiving both IV and different subcutaneous maintenance doses were included in the LTE data.5

What patient population do the low tau data represent?

This cohort represents patients with early AD and low tau levels.13,14